Shehryar Khan

Abde Manaf

At Tech4Gamers, I began as a comparison writer, analyzing GPU and CPU performance. Now, I focus on writing reviews and contributing to the best-ofs section, sharing personal insights after hands-on testing.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Ryzen 7 5800X3D feature 8 cores and 16 threads, which is lower than the higher core count of flagship models.
2. Clock Speed: The 5800X3D has a base clock of 3.4 GHz and can boost up to 4.5 GHz, which is lower than the 9800X3D’s base clock of 4.7 GHz and boost up to 5.2 GHz. 
3. L3 Cache: The 5800X3D has an impressive 96 MB of L3 cache, designed to accelerate gaming performance, while the 9800X3D matches this with 96 MB as well.
4. Process Node: While the 5800X3D is built on a 7nm manufacturing process, the 9800X3D has moved to a more advanced 4nm node.
5. TDP: The 5800X3D has a TDP of 105 watts, whereas the 9800X3D’s slightly higher 120-watt TDP reflects its more advanced architecture and clock speeds.

I am usually against hyping up processors, especially given the current market state, but the X3D chips are exceptional. The recent 9800X3D consistently beats the competition in all of our comparisons. Let’s compare the Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D to see how this line has evolved.

Gaming Benchmarks – 1080p

Now that we have gone over all the aspects of both the new and the old processors let us see how they compare when we play some games on them. All the testing will be done using a measured test bench, the specifications of which are mentioned below:

Test Bench

• OS – Windows 11 
• RAM 1 – G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5-6600
• RAM 2 – Patriot Viper LED DDR4-3600 16GB RAM
• CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U12S SE-AM4
• Graphics Card – GIGABYTE RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
• SSD – CORSAIR MP700 PRO 2TB
• Power Supply – be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W 

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor

• In the first game of our testing, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D averaged 234 FPS, which is a 44.44% improvement over the relatively low 162 FPS of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D.
• In 1% lows, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D reaches 206 FPS, outperforming the 5800X3D’s 141 FPS by 46.1%. This difference was very noticeable when we were playing these games on a high refresh rate monitor.

The Last Of Us Part 1

• The Ryzen 7 9800X3D delivered an impressive average of 208 FPS, a substantial 31.65% increase compared to the 5800X3D’s much less impressive 158 FPS.
• Coming to the lows, the 9800X3D achieved 155 FPS in The Last Of Us Part 1, which is 42.2% higher than the 5800X3D’s plateau of only 109 FPS.

Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty

• With an average of 219 FPS, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is 33.54% ahead of the 164 FPS offered by the Ryzen 7 5800X3D in our test of Cyberpunk 2077.
• In terms of 1% lows, the 9800X3D delivered 148 FPS, surpassing the 5800X3D’s 117 FPS by 26.5%, which was a less impressive difference than we saw in previous games.

Hogwarts Legacy

• In our test of Hogwarts Legacy, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D averaged 170 FPS, which was a 54.55% improvement over the 5800X3D’s noticeably lower 110 FPS.
• For 1% lows, the 9800X3D provided a minimum framerate of 111 FPS, which was 63.24% higher than the 5800X3D’s concerningly low minimum of only 68 FPS.

Remnant II

• The 9800X3D recorded an average framerate of 158 FPS when we tested Remnant II on it, while the 5800X3D had an average of 108 FPS, making the delta grow to 46.30%.
• The 1% lows of the 9800X3D were at 122 FPS, which represented a difference of 34.07% against the 5800X3D’s more modest 91 FPS lows.

Homeworld 3

• Homeworld 3 ran excellently on the 9800X3D, with an average framerate of 136 FPS, around 51.11% higher than the 90 FPS our Ryzen 7 5800X3D system could provide.
• Coming to the lows, the newer processor reached a minimum of 63 FPS, which was 34.04% better than the sub-sixty 47 FPS that the 5800X3D got.

A Plague Tale: Requiem

• We recorded a 35.42% difference in our test of A Plague Tale, with the 5800X3D getting an average of 144 FPS, while the 9800X3D had an average closer to 195 FPS.
• The lows were around 132 FPS on the 9800X3D, adding up to a 24.53% improvement over the 5800X3D’s 106 FPS.

Starfield

• Finally, the last game of our testing performed 50.54% better on the 9800X3D at 140 FPS, while the 5800X3D hovered closer to an average of 93 FPS.
• The lows were also much higher on the newer chip at around 115 FPS, whereas Starfield ran with 1% lows of only 70 FPS on the 5800X3D, creating a 64.29% divide between the two.

Productivity Benchmarks

Now that we’ve seen what these chips can do in terms of gaming performance let us take a look at how they perform in terms of performance metrics. For this section, we have used the same test bench as the one mentioned in the gaming section.

Cinebench R24

• In the multi-core test, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D had an impressive score of 1388 points, which was around 62% higher than the 858 points achieved by the 5800X3D.
• The single-core score was a bit closer, with the 9800X3D getting 135 points, while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D got a score of around 96 points, which was a difference that came out to around 40%.

7-Zip

• The compression test ran with a score of 138 points on the 9800X3D, which was around 55% higher than the 89 points of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, a remarkable difference.
• The decompression test saw a 25% improvement with the newer processor, with a score of 146 points, whereas the Ryzen 7 5800X3D had a score of 116 points.

Blender

• Finally, the last test we did was the Blender Open Data test, in which the newer processor scored 152 samples per minute, whereas the 5800X3D scored only 97 samples per minute.
• This worked out to a difference of about 56%, which means the 9800X3D was quite a bit better than the 9800X3D in this benchmark.

Overall Performance

Average Framerate

Between the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, we measured a difference of around 42% in the games that we tested in terms of average framerates. Though the averages were high with both processors, the 9800X3D was in a league of its own.

1% Lows

The difference between the two chips in 1% lows in our testing was around 40.5%, which was very noticeable in some games. Homeworld 3, for example, ran at a sub-sixty minimum framerate on the Zen 3 chip, whereas the Zen 5 processor ran it at 63 FPS.

Productivity

Overall, productivity was pretty poor from the 5800X3D, which is to be expected with it being two years old at this point, and it was never great at productivity to begin with. The 9800X3D also is only decent at productivity for today’s standards, but it blows the 5800X3D out of the water.

Temperatures

In our testing of the games mentioned above, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D ran about 10% hotter than the 9800X3D. Neither processor was excessively hot in our testing, though the lower temperatures of the 9800X3D are nice to have in the long run.

Power Consumption

In games, both processors bring up similar numbers when it comes to power consumption. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D has a 4% lower power draw, but this difference is more than made up for by the 9800X3D excellent performance.

Price And Availability

According to our research about both these processors, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is more than twice as expensive as the 5800X3D. After realizing this, the value proposition of the 5800X3D truly began to shine compared to the 9800X3D.

What We Recommend

Ryzen 7 9800X3D: As we have been saying, with all our comparisons featuring this processor, it is exceptional in terms of performance, power management, and even price concerning the other two attributes. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a truly great gaming processor.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D: This Zen 3 processor kicked everything off for the X3D line of chips, though its age shows in our testing. It had much lower performance in our testing, while the power consumption was essentially the game. However, the price is several tiers below the 9800X3D.

After all our comparisons with the 9800X3D, we can confidentially say this is the first subjective one. Either of these chips is great in its own price tier, and the decision of which to get largely relies on your budget.

Abde Manaf

[Comparisons Expert]

Abdemanaf is a skilled creative writer who has been honing his craft since 2011. While initially working in different fields, he found a passion for technology and has been exploring the tech world since early 2015. Over the years, he has developed an in-depth knowledge of the latest tech trends and product offerings by various companies.

Abdemanaf’s writing reflects his analytical mindset and ability to think critically. He has a knack for breaking down complex technical information into easily digestible pieces, making his articles engaging and accessible to readers from all backgrounds. In February 2022, he joined Tech4Gamers as a blog and product comparison writer, where he has been able to hone his skills further.

As a writer, Abdemanaf is dedicated to staying up-to-date with the latest technological advancements and trends, enabling him to provide readers with the most relevant and accurate information. He is always eager to learn more and is constantly seeking new challenges to improve his skills.

Get In Touch: manaf@tech4gamers.com

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D: We Tested Both is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News

Shehryar Khan

Senior Editor and Content Writer:

• Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
• Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
• Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
• Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

CPU	Pros	Cons
Core i7 14700K	✅ Higher E-core count than before ✅ Improved cache	❌ High power consumption
Ryzen 7 9800X3D	✅ Excellent for gaming ✅ Enhanced energy efficiency	❌ Relatively expensive

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D features 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core i7-14700K boasts a total of 20 cores (8 performance cores and 12 efficiency cores) and 28 threads.
2. Clock Speed: Ryzen 7 9800X3D runs at 4.7 GHz base and boosts to 5.2 GHz, while Core i7-14700K starts at 3.4 GHz but boosts higher to 5.6 GHz, favoring burst performance.
3. Cache: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is equipped with AMD’s 3D V-Cache technology, providing a total of 104MB cache (8MB L2 and 96MB L3). The Core i7-14700K offers 33MB of L3 cache.
4. Process Node: Ryzen is built on a 5nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses its own 10nm (Intel 7) process. Ryzen feels a bit more modern in this regard.
5. TDP: Ryzen has a 120W TDP, while the Core i7 is slightly higher at 125W. That said, the Core i7 tends to draw more power under load, especially during heavy multitasking or overclocking.

Intel and AMD have been going against each other for ages now with one taking the lead each time. But with the recent release of the X3D chips, AMD has become the talk of the town again so now we will be testing the Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Core i7 14700K to see how well they stand up against each other.

Gaming Benchmarks – 2160p

Starting off, I will test the chips on their gaming performance to conduct the test I will be running six different games at 4K resolution and max settings to see how well they can keep up with each other through these demanding requirements. Here is the testing rig for this test.

Test Bench

• OS – Windows 11 
• CPU Cooler – Enermax LiqMaxFlo 360mm
• Graphics Card – GIGABYTE RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
• SSD – XPG Gammix S50 Lite
• Power Supply – be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W
• Mobo (AMD) – ASRock X870E Taichi Lite

God of War

• In God of War, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D averaged 140 FPS, offering a 17.8% boost over the Core i7 14700k’s 117 FPS. The extra frames made the combat and exploration feel incredibly smooth.
• However, the Core i7 surprised me with better 1% lows at 101 FPS, a 23.2% improvement over Ryzen’s 80 FPS. This meant fewer noticeable dips during fast-paced battles on the Core i7.

Cyberpunk 2077

• Cyberpunk 2077 felt more alive on Ryzen, with 97 FPS on average, compared to 78 FPS on Core i7. That’s a solid 21.7% improvement, and it was very noticeable in busy areas of Night City.
• Where Ryzen really shined was in 1% lows, delivering 75 FPS versus 58 FPS on the Core i7, a difference of 25.5%. Frame dips on Ryzen were barely noticeable even during chaotic firefights.

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

• Exploring the vast world of Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Ryzen gave me an average of 130 FPS, which was 18.6% higher than Core i7’s 108 FPS. It was a smooth experience for the most part.
• During combat and heavy action, Ryzen handled frame stability better, with 1% lows of 105 FPS. That’s 22.2% ahead of the Core i7, which only managed 84 FPS.

Watch Dogs Legion

• Watch Dogs Legion ran smoother overall on Ryzen, averaging 129 FPS compared to 107 FPS on Core i7. That’s a 180.6% uplift, and it made city exploration and high-speed driving feel much better.
• For the 1% lows, Ryzen edged out Core i7 by a smaller margin of 10.9%, hitting 106 FPS versus 95 FPS. The difference wasn’t huge, but it was noticeable in some intense moments.

Red Dead Redemption 2

• Red Dead Redemption 2 looked amazing on Ryzen, with an average of 133 FPS compared to Core i7’s 109 FPS, a 19.8% improvement. The higher frame rate added to the cinematic feel of the game.
• What really stood out was the 1% lows. Ryzen delivered 107 FPS here, while Core i7 lagged behind at just 76 FPS, a massive 33.8% difference. This meant zero stutters on Ryzen even in busy towns.

Horizon Zero Dawn

• Ryzen gave me 135 FPS on average in Horizon Zero Dawn, which was 17.7% better than the 113 FPS on Core i7. traveling Aloy’s vibrant world felt incredibly smooth with Ryzen.
• On 1% lows, there wasn’t much difference. Ryzen hit 98 FPS, just 3.1% higher than Core i7’s 95 FPS. Both handled frame dips well, so gameplay felt steady on either processor.

Productivity Benchmarks

Since we have gotten enough results in the gaming division, let’s now move to productivity benchmarks where I will test both their single and multi-core performance in a few different software to crown a winner.

Cinebench R24

• In the single-core test, Ryzen scored 133, just a slight 1.5% better than the Core i7, which scored 131. Both CPUs perform nearly identically here.
• In the multi-core test, Core i7 really pulled ahead, scoring 2021 compared to Ryzen’s 1318. That’s a 42.1% difference, making the Core i7 significantly better for multi-threaded tasks.

Geekbench 6

• Geekbench’s single-core test showed Ryzen scoring 3307, which was 12.3% higher than Core i7’s 2921. Ryzen felt slightly snappier in single-threaded applications.
• For multi-core, the Core i7 scored 19560, just 7% better than Ryzen’s 18223. Both are excellent here, but the Core i7 has a slight edge for demanding workloads.

iGPU – FP32 Performance

• In terms of integrated GPU performance, Core i7 dominated with a score of 820, a 36.9% improvement over Ryzen’s 564. If you rely on the iGPU for tasks, the Core i7 is far superior.

Overall Performance

Average Framerate

While testing the average FPS on both chips, I always found the 9800X3D in a clear lead in all games, thanks to its big reserves of 3D V-Cache. Moreover, the lead was quite significant as well since I found the 14700K to be trailing behind 18.9% on average.

1% Lows

The 1% lows also showcased a similar scenario as the 9800X3D took the stage with an 11.4% lead on average against its competitor. But strangely enough, the 14700K performed well in God of War where the dips were handled way better on the Intel processor.

Productivity

In terms of productivity, both chips were a little tied up with the 9800X3D performing better in single-core tasks, while the 14700K maintained a lead in multicore performance. But based on the sheer difference, I am inclined to favor the Intel chip to perform better in this regard.

Thermal Efficiency

I also kept their temperature management in check while running them through different games and after curating my results I found the 14700K to be running 12.4% cooler on average compared to the 9800X3D which could be due to its high performance.

Price 

Reseraching the market for the pricing, the 14700K won it quite easily as it is currently being sold at a 34.9% cheaper price than the 9800X3D which is a significant number that can make a lot of people change their decision.

What We Recommend

AMD Core i7-14700K: If you are currently on a limited budget and are just looking for a processor to boost your productivity then the 14700K is your best bet as it’s not only cheaper but also provides great multi-core performance.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: The X3D chips always deliver what they are famous for, gaming performance. The 9800X3D also complies with this notion and creates a huge gap against any chip that it is compared against.

Overall, if you don’t have any budget constraints and are willing to spend a little more on your processor then the 9800X3D is the best choice. But if that’s not the case, the 14700K is also a formidable processor that can get most things done without breaking a sweat.

Shehryar Khan

[Comparisons Expert]

Shehryar Khan, a seasoned PC hardware expert, brings over three years of extensive experience and a deep passion for the world of technology. With a love for building PCs and a genuine enthusiasm for exploring the latest advancements in components, his expertise shines through his work and dedication towards this field. Currently, Shehryar is rocking a custom loop setup for his built.

Get In Touch: shehryar@tech4gamers.com

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Core i7 14700K: Our Recommendation is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News

Uzair Qureshi

At Tech4Gamers, I proudly wear the title of Comparisons Specialist. Focused on CPUs and GPUs, I bring forth a wealth of hands-on experience and a keen eye for detail to provide our audience with the latest insights and analyses.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

CPU	Pros	Cons
Ryzen 9 9950X	✅ Has 8 more physical cores ✅ Unlocked multiplier	❌ Much more expensive
Ryzen 7 9800X3D	✅ Has 32MB larger L3 cache size ✅ Better in terms of performance	❌ Worse synthetic multithreaded performance

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, half the number of the 9950X’s 16 cores and 32 threads.
2. Clock Speed: The 9950X has a base clock of 4.3GHz and a boost clock of around 5.7GHz. The 9800X3D, however, has a base clock of 4.7GHz and a boost of up to 5.2GHz.
3. Cache: The 9800X3D’s headline feature is the L3 cache, which has 96 megabytes on its die, while the 9950X only has 64 megabytes.
4. Process Node: Both these processors are based on a 4nm manufacturing process, which is to be expected as they are based on the same architecture.
5. TDP: The 9950X has a much higher 170-watt TDP than the 120-watt TDP of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

AMD has been the scrappy underdog of the CPU industry for a while now, and nothing has solidified their products more than their X3D line of chips, but how much better are they than their vanilla counterparts? Let us find out in the Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 9950X comparison!

Gaming Benchmarks – 1080p

Having looked at the specs of these chips, we now come to the time when we must evaluate them based on their performance in games. To do this, we have devised a tailor-made test bench, the specs of which are written below:

Test Bench

• OS – Windows 11 
• CPU Cooler – Enermax LiqMaxFlo 360mm
• Graphics Card – GIGABYTE RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
• SSD – XPG Gammix S50 Lite
• Power Supply – ENERMAX REVOLUTION D.F. X 1050W Review
• Mobo (AMD) – ASRock X870E Taichi Lite

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor

• This comparison started with a bang. The 9800X3D’s average framerate in this game was 234 FPS, 47% higher than the 159 FPS supplied by the 9950X.
• The 1% lows also differed by around 50%, with the 9800X3D hovering around 206 FPS, whereas the 9950X had a much lower framerate of 138 FPS in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor.

The Last Of Us Part 1

• We saw a more modest 14% difference in this game, with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D getting a framerate of about 208 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 9950X stuck closer to 182 FPS.
• The 1% lows were around 155 FPS on the newer chip, whereas the 9950X took a 30% loss in framerate with a minimum of 119 FPS.

Cyberpunk 2077

• Testing Cyberpunk 2077 on both processors highlighted a difference of around 37%, with the Ryzen 7 getting an average of 219 FPS while the Ryzen 9 got around 160 FPS.
• The minimums were around 148 FPS on the X3D chip in our testing, while the Ryzen 9 9950X matched the lows of the last game with a framerate of 119 FPS, leading to a 24% loss compared to its rival.

Assetto Corsa Competizione

• This game hovered around 269 FPS on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, while the Ryzen 9 9950X hit an average of 160 FPS in our testing, leading to a difference of about 56%.
• The minimum framerates were also starkly dissimilar between the two processors. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D got lows of 223 FPS, while the 9950X struggled to keep up with 145 FPS.

Remnant 2

• The Ryzen 9 closed the gap with this game, getting an average framerate of 123 FPS, which was around 28% lower than the 158 FPS of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.
• The 1% lows brought the difference even lower, with the 9800X3D hovering around a framerate of 122 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 9950X got a framerate closer to 99 FPS.

Homeworld 3

• In our test of Homeworld 3, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D achieved 135 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 9950X reached 92 FPS. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D was ahead by around 47%, which is a significant difference.
• In the 1% lows, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D held steady at 63 FPS, compared to 45 FPS on the Ryzen 9 9950X, giving the X3D chip a 40% lead.

Starfield

• With 140 FPS on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and 111 FPS on the Ryzen 9 9950X, the 9800X3D was around 26% faster in our testing of Starfield.
• The 1% lows showed a similar story, with the 9800X3D at 115 FPS versus 88 FPS on the 9950X, which comes out to a 31% improvement for the X3D chip over its vanilla older brother.

Watch Dogs: Legion

• Running at 217 FPS on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, compared to 170 FPS on the Ryzen 9 9950X, the 9800X3D led around 28% in the final test of our gaming suite.
• In the 1% low framerates, the 9800X3D maintained 160 FPS, while the 9950X held at 122 FPS, giving the 9800X3D a 31% edge in Watch Dogs Legion.

Productivity Benchmarks

Now that we have reviewed the specs and gaming benchmarks for these new chips, we can highlight their gaming performance. To do this, we used the same test bench for the gaming tests.

Cinebench 2024

• In the single-core test, we noticed a 4% difference in performance between these chips. The 9800X3D scored 135 points, while the 9950X held closer to 141 points.
• The multi-core score showed a much bigger difference, with the 9950X scoring 2342 points, which was around 70% higher than the 1384 points that the Ryzen 7 had accumulated.

7-Zip

• In our 7-Zip compression test, we noticed a difference of around 38% between the two chips, with the Ryzen 7 scoring 138 points and the 9950X scoring 191 points.
• Decompression was a much different story, with the newer chip getting a score of 145 points, whereas the 9950X had an 89% lead with a score of 274 points.

Photoshop

• The Pudget Systems test showed very similar results between the two chips, indicating that real-world performance might vary from that in synthetic benchmarks.
• The 9950X had a score of around 11915 points, while the 9800X3D came in around 5% ahead with a score of 12549 points.

Overall Performance

Average Framerate

The performance of the 9800X3D was exceptional in our testing, coming ahead of the 9950X without fail in the games that we tested. We measured a difference of around 35% across the average framerates of our benchmark tests.

1% Lows

The great performance of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D spilled over to the 1% lows. Here, we measured a difference of about 36%, which had noticeable effects on the gaming experience. The 9800X3D consistently felt smoother to game on in our testing.

Productivity

Productivity was not the strong suit of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, at least in the synthetic benchmarks we tested. However, testing Photoshop did yield noticeably better results than the 9950X, likely because of the extra legroom our graphics card had because of this processor.

Temperatures

Temperatures were very similar between these chips, with the 9950X being only 1.2% hotter than the 9800X3D. This difference could easily be chalked up to the margin of error. Both chips had manageable temperatures in our testing, and this metric did not factor into our evaluation of these processors.

Power Consumption

As we expected, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D had excellent power management in our testing. Not only did it beat the 9950X game after game with a significant margin, but the 9800X3D also took around 54% less power than the 9950X.

Price And Availability

In our web search for prices, we saw that the Ryzen 9 9950X has not dropped in price at all since its launch MSRP. This leaves a 48% difference in price between the two chips, with the 9800X3D being around 200 USD cheaper than its competitor.

What We Recommend

Ryzen 7 9800X3D: AMD’s improvements with this chip are commendable. It has a lower power draw than its older brother while having better performance, all on top of a lower price tag. The one chip on its shoulder is its lower performance in multi-threaded compute-heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 9950X: This chip was not remarkable when released and does not break any records now. If you want a processor that has as many cores as possible crammed into it, go ahead with the 9950X, but it’s not great for much else, which is a point exacerbated by its rival for this comparison.

AMD has made this comparison easy for us. We can recommend the 9800X3D to anyone looking for the best gaming performance possible, while the 9950X should only be bought by consumers who require the extra cores it offers.

Uzair Qureshi

[Comparisons Specialist]

I’m a passionate computer hardware expert specializing in CPUs and GPUs. With a lifelong curiosity for hardware and extensive hands-on experience, I provide valuable insights, practical advice, and in-depth analysis on these components. Engaging with the hardware community, I exchange knowledge and stay at the forefront of technological advancements.

Get In Touch: uzair@tech4gamers.com

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 9950X: We’re Shocked is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News

Shehryar Khan

Senior Editor and Content Writer:

• Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
• Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
• Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
• Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

CPU	Pros	Cons
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D	✅ Great for gaming ✅ Option complete overclocking	❌ Lower core and thread count
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X	✅ Competitive price tag ✅ Great thermal efficiency	❌ Inferior gaming performance

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9900X packs 12 cores and 24 threads, making it better suited for heavy multitasking.
2. Clock Speed: The 9800X3D runs at a base clock of 4.7 GHz and boosts up to 5.2 GHz. On the other hand, the 9900X starts at 4.4 GHz but can boost up to an impressive 5.6 GHz.
3. Cache: The 9800X3D has a huge L3 cache of 96 MB thanks to its 3D V-Cache, compared to the 9900X’s 64 MB. However, the 9900X edges ahead with a larger L2 cache of 12 MB versus the 9800X3D’s 8 MB.
4. Process Node: Both chips are built using TSMC’s advanced 4nm process, which ensures excellent performance while keeping power usage in check.
5. TDP: Both processors have a TDP of 120W, meaning they require similar levels of cooling, though their efficiency ensures heat management isn’t too demanding.

The X3D chips have taken the stage ever since their release due to their history and performance. But as with the release of every chip, there is always some room for skepticism. Today, I will put an end to some of these rumors by testing the Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs. Ryzen 9 9900X. Let’s get started.

Gaming Benchmarks – 2160p

In order to ensure transparency and accuracy, we will be using the same testing rig for both chips and test them across six different games at 4K resolution while keeping all settings at max. Moreover, here is the list of the components used in our rig.

Test Bench

• OS – Windows 11 
• CPU Cooler – Enermax LiqMaxFlo 360mm
• Graphics Card – GIGABYTE RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
• SSD – XPG Gammix S50 Lite
• Power Supply – be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W
• Mobo (AMD) – ASRock X870E Taichi Lite

God of War

• The Ryzen 7 9800X3D pulled ahead with an average of 139 FPS, a 7.1% boost over the Ryzen 9 9900X’s 127 FPS. Honestly, the smoother gameplay here felt great, especially in intense combat scenes.
• Moreover, the 9800X3D hit 80 FPS in 1% lows compared to the 9900X’s 95 FPS, showing a 17% drop. This was noticeable in certain cutscenes where the frame dips felt less consistent on the 9800X3D.

Cyberpunk 2077

• In Night City, the 9800X3D scored an average of 95 FPS, which was almost 39% better than the 9900X’s 64 FPS. It’s honestly a night-and-day difference when exploring the world.
• The 9800X3D handled lows better at 75 FPS, 34% stronger than the 9900X’s 53 FPS. The smoother dips made driving around feel less choppy.

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

• Valhalla ran noticeably better on the 9800X3D, averaging 129 FPS, 19.5% higher than the 105 FPS on the 9900X. The extra frames made traversal and combat way more fluid.
• When it came to 1% lows, the 9800X3D led again with 105 FPS, about 18.7% better than the 9900X’s 87 FPS. This kept the gameplay buttery smooth during large-scale fights.

Watch Dogs Legion

• The 9800X3D pushed 128 FPS, giving it a strong 21% advantage over the 9900X’s 103 FPS. The fluid frame rates were especially noticeable during car chases in the busy streets of London.
• Furthermore, the 1% lows on the 9800X3D were 107 FPS, nearly 19.5% better than the 9900X’s 88 FPS. Honestly, I didn’t notice any stutters during hectic action sequences.

Red Dead Redemption 2

• With 137 FPS on the 9800X3D, it’s about 10% faster than the 9900X’s 121 FPS. Exploring the open world felt a bit more responsive, particularly when riding through dense forests.
• The 1% lows on the 9800X3D reached 107 FPS, an impressive 30% higher than the 79 FPS on the 9900X. It made even the busiest towns feel much more stable.

Horizon Zero Dawn

• Aloy’s adventures on the 9800X3D averaged 146 FPS, a noticeable 14% boost over the 9900X’s 128 FPS. Those extra frames really shine during combat with multiple enemies.
• At 99 FPS for 1% lows, the 9800X3D led by 20% compared to the 81 FPS on the 9900X. It kept things steady, even during chaotic fights with large machines.

Productivity Benchmarks

Now that we are done with the gaming benchmarks, let’s move on to the next stage and test out the chips based on their performance on different productivity tasks.

Cinebench R24

• The Ryzen 9 9900X edges out the 9800X3D here, scoring 139 points compared to the 9800X3D’s 133, a modest 3.3% lead. For single-core tasks, the 9900X just feels a touch snappier.
• Moreover, the 9900X pulls ahead again with 1769 points, 29% higher than the 9800X3D’s 1318. If you’re doing heavy rendering or multi-threaded tasks, the 9900X clearly has more horsepower.

Geekbench 6

• The 9900X narrowly beats the 9800X3D with a score of 3349 compared to 3307, a tiny 1.2% difference. Honestly, it’s a negligible gap—both perform equally well in single-threaded tasks.
• Again the 9900X flexes its multi-core muscles here with a score of 19,758, an 8% improvement over the 9800X3D’s 18,223. If you’re doing CPU-intensive multitasking, it’s a win for the 9900X.

iGPU – FP32 Performance

• Integrated graphics performance is exactly the same, so no surprises if you’re relying on onboard GPUs since they are majorly just used for display attributes in case you don’t have a dedicated graphics card.

Overall Performance

Average Framerate

As I compiled all the results from my testing, the 9800X3D was found to be in a clear lead as it provided 17.7% more FPS compared to the 9900X on average. Furthermore, the results were so consistent that the latter didn’t even take the lead.

1% Lows

A similar scenario was observed in the 1% lows category as the 9800X3D had an average of 17% advantage over the 9900X on average but it did falter once in God of War where the 9900X got a 17.1% lead over it.

Productivity

Unlike the gaming performance, the productivity landscape showed a different picture as the more core and thread counts of the 9900X came in handy and allowed it to lead pretty much all the tests we conducted on both of the chips.

Thermal Efficiency

In terms of thermal efficiency both the chips performed quite alike as there was only a small difference of 4.6% noticed among them. In most cases, they were found running on slightly higher temps but that has been the usual case in these chips.

Price 

While going over the price tags, the 9900X is available 22.5% cheaper compared to the 9800X3D, as it is still relatively new to the market. Moreover, this difference can increase even more if the shortage issues aren’t fixed soon.

What We Recommend

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X: If you are running on a tight budget and want to find a good processor for productivity tasks then the 9900X is your best bet. The processor is equipped with a higher core and thread count while being available at a cheaper price point.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: The main focus of the X3D chips is to provide absolute gaming performance, and the 9800X3D follows in the same footsteps. So if you don’t have any budget constraints and are looking for a good boost to your gaming performance, this is the processor to buy.

Overall, I would easily recommend the 9900X to most users in normal circumstances as it provides a better price-to-performance ratio. But if you don’t want to compromise on the gaming aspect then you should get the 9800X3D.

Shehryar Khan

[Comparisons Expert]

Shehryar Khan, a seasoned PC hardware expert, brings over three years of extensive experience and a deep passion for the world of technology. With a love for building PCs and a genuine enthusiasm for exploring the latest advancements in components, his expertise shines through his work and dedication towards this field. Currently, Shehryar is rocking a custom loop setup for his built.

Get In Touch: shehryar@tech4gamers.com

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 9900X: We Tested Both is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News

Shehryar Khan

Senior Editor and Content Writer:

• Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
• Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
• Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
• Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

CPU	Pros	Cons
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D	✅ 96MB of L3 Cache ✅ Improved overclocking potential	❌ Inferior core and thread count
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D	✅ Enhanced gaming performance ✅ Improved power efficiency	❌ Less efficient in temperature management

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: Firstly, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D packs 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D steps it up with 12 cores and 24 threads.
2. Clock Speed: Moving onto speeds, the 9800X3D runs at a base clock of 4.7 GHz, boosting up to 5.2 GHz, whereas the 7900X3D starts at 4.4 GHz and can reach up to 5.6 GHz.
3. Cache: In the cache department, the 9800X3D features 104MB of cache (8MB L2 + 96MB L3), and the 7900X3D offers 140MB (12MB L2 + 128MB L3).
4. Process Node: The 9800X3D is built on a 4nm process, while the 7900X3D uses a 5nm process, showcasing the more advanced technology on the former.
5. TDP: When it comes to power draw, both the processors have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 120W.

The X3D chips from the 9000 series have recently appeared in the market and are already garnering massive attention due to their infamous performance standards. In this article, I will test the Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D to see which one comes out on top.

Gaming Benchmarks – 2160p

To keep things fair and accurate, both of these chips will be tested across a number of games at 4K resolution and the same testing rig to find out their difference in performance when it comes to gaming benchmarks. Let’s get started.

Test Bench

• OS – Windows 11 
• CPU Cooler – Enermax LiqMaxFlo 360mm
• Graphics Card – GIGABYTE RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
• SSD – XPG Gammix S50 Lite
• Power Supply – be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W
• Mobo (AMD) – ASRock X870E Taichi Lite

God of War

• Playing God of War on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, I noticed an average of 141 FPS, while the 7900X3D lagged behind at 124 FPS. That’s about a 12.8% increase with the 9800X3D, which gave it a smoother feel overall.
• For those pesky frame drops, the 9800X3D held up better, sticking around 80 FPS versus the 7900X3D’s 75 FPS a modest 6.4% difference. It’s not a massive change, but enough to make things feel a bit more stable.

Cyberpunk 2077

• Cyberpunk 2077 felt noticeably smoother with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, reaching 93 FPS compared to just 74 FPS on the 7900X3D. That’s a solid 22.7% boost, which makes a difference when you’re racing through Night City.
• The 1% lows really highlight the 9800X3D’s advantage of 75 FPS versus the 7900X3D’s 50 FPS, giving a 40% improvement. Those dips did less stuttering, keeping the game fluid even in intense moments.

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

• In Valhalla, the 9800X3D pushed out 131 FPS while the 7900X3D managed 106 FPS, about a 21% difference. That extra boost helped a lot in crowded areas, making the game feel more immersive.
• The 9800X3D held a steadier baseline too, with 1% lows at 105 FPS compared to 87 FPS on the 7900X3D, a roughly 18.7% increase. Those minor drops were barely noticeable, even in intense action sequences.

Watch Dogs Legion

• With Watch Dogs Legion, I got 123 FPS on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D versus 102 FPS on the 7900X3D, an 18.6% bump. This extra power was noticeable in the fast-paced car chases and kept things feeling sharp.
• The 1% lows were also stronger on the 9800X3D, holding around 107 FPS compared to 89 FPS on the 7900X3D (around an 18.3% gain). It really made a difference when dashing through busy parts of the city.

Red Dead Redemption 2

• Red Dead Redemption 2 was especially smooth on the 9800X3D, hitting 142 FPS compared to the 7900X3D’s 116 FPS, or about 20.1% more frames. This made roaming through the stunning open world feel even more seamless.
• In those unpredictable moments like big gunfights or fast action scenes the 9800X3D held its ground with 1% lows around 106 FPS, whereas the 7900X3D dropped to 75 FPS, a big 34.2% difference. 

Horizon Zero Dawn

• On Horizon Zero Dawn, the 9800X3D ran at an average of 139 FPS, compared to 123 FPS on the 7900X3D, giving about a 12.2% edge. This boost added a bit more smoothness to the gorgeous landscapes and intense battles.
• The 1% lows on the 9800X3D hit around 103 FPS, compared to 92 FPS on the 7900X3D a decent 11.2% difference. This consistency made the gameplay feel less choppy, even in dense, foliage-heavy areas.

Productivity Benchmarks

Now that the gaming section has been covered, let’s move on to the productivity scales and see how these processors hold up against each other across a number of different benchmark tests.

Cinebench R24

• The Ryzen 7 9800X3D pulled a score of 133 in Cinebench R24 single-core, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D came in slightly lower at 122. That’s an 8.6% edge with the 9800X3D, giving it a slight bump in single-threaded tasks.
• But the 7900X3D takes the lead in multi-core performance here, scoring 1596 compared to the 9800X3D’s 1318 a solid 19% advantage. This higher multi-core performance on the 7900X3D would be helpful for intensive workloads.

Geekbench 6

• In Geekbench’s single-core test, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D delivered a score of 3307, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D only managed 2235. That’s a pretty significant 38.6% increase for the 9800X3D, which translates to snappier performance.
• Both processors are pretty close in multi-core here. The 9800X3D scored 18,223, and the 7900X3D was just a touch behind at 17,857, a minor 2% difference. But the 9800X3D did edge out slightly in multi-threaded workloads as well.

iGPU – FP32 Performance

• Both processors scored identically in the FP32 performance test at 564. No difference here both handle this benchmark with equal efficiency.

Overall Performance

Average Framerate

After completing the gaming benchmarks, the 9800X3D can be easily crowned as the victor as it not only provides a significant 17.5% advantage in overall performance but beats the 7900X3D in every game we tested with a comfortable margin.

1% Lows

Similar to the average FPS, the 1% paints a similar picture as I saw the 7900X3D provides a 20.6% more stable gaming performance and lower FPS dips when compared to the 7900X3D showcasing the advantage of the newer gen’s technological advancement.

Productivity

Finally, going over the productivity benchmarks both processors were closely tied, with one taking the lead over the other under different tests. But I will give a slight edge to the 9800X3D as it provides close performance and belongs to the latest generation.

Thermal Efficiency

In terms of thermal efficiency, my testing showcased the 7900X3D to be performing better than the 9800X3D. On average the former ran 13.5% cooler than its competition which could be due to the performance capabilities of the new chip.

Price 

As I researched the market for the pricing aspect, I found the 9800X3D to be 21.4% cheaper than the 7900X3D as its launch price is lower. But this can change pretty soon if the stocks run out and scalpers take advantage of the situation.

What We Recommend

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D: After benchmarking the 7900X3D under different situations, I can comfortably say the processor can still hold its own against a lot of the other options currently available in the market while generating less heat.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: The X3D chips have always been a powerhouse and the very same is true for the 9800X3D. It can take everything you throw at it head-on and still come out with great results which showcases the capability of this processor.

Although both processors have their advantages when compared against each other the 9800X3D takes the crown as it not only beats the 7900X3D in all gaming benchmarks but also gives it a very tough time when it comes to productivity tasks.

Shehryar Khan

[Comparisons Expert]

Shehryar Khan, a seasoned PC hardware expert, brings over three years of extensive experience and a deep passion for the world of technology. With a love for building PCs and a genuine enthusiasm for exploring the latest advancements in components, his expertise shines through his work and dedication towards this field. Currently, Shehryar is rocking a custom loop setup for his built.

Get In Touch: shehryar@tech4gamers.com

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: We Tested Both is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News

Shehryar Khan

Senior Editor and Content Writer:

• Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
• Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
• Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
• Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

CPU	Pros	Cons
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D	✅ Provides 96MB of L3 Cache ✅ Absolute option for overclocking	❌ Less efficient in productivity tasks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D	✅ Equipped with 128MB L3 Cache ✅ Power Efficient	❌ Inferior thermal efficiency

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: Starting off, the 7950X3D takes a comfortable lead by offering users 16 cores and 32 threads as compared to the 8 cores and 16 threads equipped on the 9800X3D.
2. Clock Speed: While going over the clock speeds the 9800X3D offers a better base clock speed of 4.7GHz as compared to 4.2GHz. But the 7950X3D makes a comeback with a 5.7GHz boost clock speed when compared to the 5.2GHz offered by the latter. 
3. Cache: As for cache, the 9800X3D is equipped with 96MB of shared L3 cache, which easily gets outclassed by the 128MB available on the 7950X3D chip.
4. Process Node: Moving on to the process node, the 9800X3D offers the more efficient 4nm process size while the 7950X3D comes with a slightly bigger 5nm process size.
5. TDP: Although the processors differ in other categories, they both host a similar 120 TDP rating but due to the difference in technology one could be more power efficient than the other.

With the recent release of the X3D chips of the 9000 series by AMD, the market has been buzzing with the news of how well they are performing. But the real question is, can the 9800X3D beat the flagship model from the last gen? Let’s find out in our Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D comparison.

Gaming Benchmarks – 2160p

To kick things off, let’s start with the gaming benchmarks to test these chips at their limits we will be putting them through a number of games at 4K resolution to see how well they perform against each other on the same testing bench mentioned below.

Test Bench

• OS – Windows 11 
• CPU Cooler – Enermax LiqMaxFlo 360mm
• Graphics Card – GIGABYTE RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
• SSD – XPG Gammix S50 Lite
• Power Supply – be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W
• Mobo (AMD) – ASRock X870E Taichi Lite

God of War

• In God of War, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D averages 119 FPS, just slightly higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s 116 FPS. It’s a 2.5% minor edge, but it adds a bit of extra fluidity to the gameplay.
• The 1% lows show a more noticeable gap, with the 9800X3D hitting 89 FPS compared to the 7950X3D’s 71 FPS. This 22.5% advantage helps keep the action feeling steady, even during intense battles.

Cyberpunk 2077

• Cyberpunk 2077 runs smoother on the 9800X3D, reaching an average of 96 FPS versus 70 FPS on the 7950X3D. This 31.3% difference is significant, making a real impact on the overall experience.
• The 1% lows highlight the difference even more, with 75 FPS on the 9800X3D and just 51 FPS on the 7950X3D. That’s a substantial 38% difference, which helps avoid those annoying frame drops in crowded city scenes.

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

• In Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the 9800X3D averages 130 FPS, offering a nice 13.9% bump over the 7950X3D’s 113 FPS. This extra boost makes a noticeable difference in open-world exploration.
• The 9800X3D handles lows better here as well, with 105 FPS compared to the 7950X3D’s 86 FPS. That 19.8% lead smooths out the action and reduces stutter during intense fights.

Watch Dogs Legion

• Watch Dogs Legion runs at 125 FPS on the 9800X3D, while the 7950X3D manages 113 FPS. The 10% difference isn’t huge but provides a slightly better experience, especially in detailed city environments.
• The 9800X3D’s 1% lows come in at 106 FPS versus the 7950X3D’s 92 FPS. This 14.1% lead helps the 9800X3D feel more responsive, reducing stutters during action-packed moments.

Red Dead Redemption 2

• With Red Dead Redemption 2, the 9800X3D delivers 143 FPS on average, while the 7950X3D trails slightly at 127 FPS. This extra 11.8% power makes the landscapes look smoother and more immersive.
• The difference in 1% lows is quite noticeable, with the 9800X3D at 106 FPS and the 7950X3D at just 69 FPS. That 42.2% advantage ensures fewer frame drops, keeping gameplay smooth in complex scenes.

Horizon Zero Dawn

• Horizon Zero Dawn shows a significant improvement on the 9800X3D, with an impressive 197 FPS compared to 123 FPS on the 7950X3D. That’s a huge 46.2% difference, making the game look stunningly smooth.
• The 9800X3D also performs better in 1% lows, hitting 103 FPS compared to 95 FPS on the 7950X3D. This 8% difference helps keep things consistent, even during intense action sequences.

Productivity Benchmarks

Now that we have covered the gaming benchmarks, let’s switch the landscape a little and see how well these chips perform when it comes to synthetic environments:

Cinebench R24

• In single-core performance in Cinebench 24, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D scores 133, slightly ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s 122. That 8.6% difference adds a slight edge in single-threaded tasks.
• The Ryzen 9 7950X3D takes the lead here, scoring 2108 versus the 9800X3D’s 1318. This 46.1% difference shows a clear advantage in multi-core tasks.

Geekbench 6

• In Geekbench’s single-core test, the 9800X3D scores 3307, which is about 12.8% higher than the 7950X3D’s 2908. This gives the 9800X3D a slight edge in single-threaded performance.
• The 7950X3D scores 19481 in multi-core performance, surpassing the 9800X3D’s 18223 by about 6.6%. It’s not a huge gap, but it does show the 7950X3D’s multi-threading advantage.

iGPU – FP32 Performance

• For tasks that rely on the iGPU’s FP32 capabilities, like basic graphic rendering or computation, there’s no advantage between these processors; they deliver the same level of performance.

Overall Performance

Average Framerate

Both processors were seen to show remarkable gaming performance but the 9800X3D took a clear lead of 20.1% over the 7950X3D. During my testing, Moreover, during my testing, I never saw the latter taking any lead over the 9800X3D which proves its dominance in this sector.

1% Lows

The 1% lows also pained a similar picture with the 9800X3D maintaining on average a comfortable 22.9% lead over the 7950X3D. With the gap even increasing to 42.2% lead in games like Red Dead Redemption 2.

Productivity

On the other hand, the productivity charts mostly painted a different picture with the 7950X3D utilizing its higher core and thread count to maintain its lead over the 9800X3D since it was ahead in most of the tests.

Thermal Efficiency

While testing the thermal efficiency during gaming, I found the 7950X3D to run a little cooler compared to the 9800X3D. It kept a small lead of 8.8% on average across the games that were benchmarked.

Price 

On the pricing front, the 9800X3D takes the cake, as it offers a 21.9% lower price compared to the 7950X3D. But since it is still new to the market, it may start to face shortage issues which can hike the prices in no time.

What We Recommend

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D: If you are in the market looking for a CPU that helps you in your productivity tasks then the 7950X3D is a good choice. But the users need to decide whether the price point is worth getting it for at the moment when there are better options available.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: The 9800X3D is an absolute beast when it comes to gaming performance, the chip offers a massive advantage in games at a decent price tag which makes it tempting for a lot of gamers who are in the market looking for a good CPU.

Overall, both the chips have their good and bad while one offers great productivity it comes at a higher price tag. Meanwhile the other performs well in gaming, it slightly falls behind in productivity. So the final decision rests on the needs of the end user. 

Shehryar Khan

[Comparisons Expert]

Shehryar Khan, a seasoned PC hardware expert, brings over three years of extensive experience and a deep passion for the world of technology. With a love for building PCs and a genuine enthusiasm for exploring the latest advancements in components, his expertise shines through his work and dedication towards this field. Currently, Shehryar is rocking a custom loop setup for his built.

Get In Touch: shehryar@tech4gamers.com

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Our Recommendation is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News

Uzair Qureshi

At Tech4Gamers, I proudly wear the title of Comparisons Specialist. Focused on CPUs and GPUs, I bring forth a wealth of hands-on experience and a keen eye for detail to provide our audience with the latest insights and analyses.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

CPU	Pros	Cons
Core Ultra 9 285K	✅ More powerful Intel Arc Xe2 Integrated graphics ✅ Has 16 more physical cores	❌ Higher price ❌ Worse in terms of performance
Ryzen 9 9950X	✅ Has 61440 KB larger L3 cache size ✅ Better in terms of performance	❌ Higher temperatures

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: The Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 cores and 24 threads (8 performance and 16 efficiency), which is higher than the 9800X3D’s 8 cores and 16 threads.
2. Clock Speed: The Core Ultra 9 285K base frequency is 3.7GHz, and it goes up to a 5.5GHz boost, which is higher than the 5.2GHz boost of the 9800X3D. The base clock of AMD’s chip is 4.7GHz.
3. Cache: The L3 cache of the Core Ultra 9 285K is 36 megabytes, whereas the Ryzen 7 9800X3D has a headlining 96 megabytes of L3 cache.
4. Process Node: Intel’s chip has a 3nm manufacturing node, whereas the Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses a 4nm processing node.
5. TDP: Both processors have a similar power intake, with the 285K having a TDP of 125 watts, whereas the Ryzen 7 9800X3D has a TDP of 120 watts.

With all of the mediocre tech releases these days, AMD’s X3D chips are a breath of fresh air with their constant innovations. Let us compare the Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Core Ultra 9 285K to see if Intel’s shiny new processor can compete against AMD’s latest and greatest.

Gaming Benchmarks – 1080p

Now that we’ve gone through the specifications of these chips, let’s take a look at the gaming benchmarks for these processors. Both of them were tested at 1080p with the test bench that is mentioned below:

Test Bench

• OS – Windows 11 
• CPU Cooler – Enermax LiqMaxFlo 360mm
• Graphics Card – GIGABYTE RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
• SSD – XPG Gammix S50 Lite
• Power Supply – be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W
• Mobo (AMD) – ASRock X870E Taichi Lite
• Mobo (Intel) – MSI MPG Z890 Edge Ti WiFi Review

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor

• Kicking these tests off, we see a huge difference between these chips in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor. The 9800X3D has an average of 234 FPS, whereas the 285K was 51% behind with an average of 155 FPS.
• The 1% lows of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D hit 206 FPS, whereas the Core Ultra 9 was once again 52% with a framerate of 135 FPS, which gave a significantly downgraded experience against the competition.

The Last Of Us Part 1

• The difference got down to only 6% in this game, with an average of 208 FPS with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, whereas the Intel chip went a bit further down to 196 FPS.
• The difference in the lows was around 7%, with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D hanging out around 155 FPS, while Core Ultra was a few steps down with a framerate of 145 FPS.

Cyberpunk 2077

• Testing Cyberpunk 2077 revealed a huge difference in the performance of these processors. The Ryzen was 66% ahead with a framerate of 219 FPS, while the Core Ultra had a framerate of 132 FPS.
• The Ryzen 7 9800X3D had a minimum framerate of 148 FPS in our testing, which was an impressive 48% ahead of the 100 FPS of the Core Ultra 9.

Assetto Corsa Competizione

• In this test, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D had an average framerate of 269 FPS, an order of magnitude above the 154 FPS of the 285K. The difference in this test was around 75%.
• The 1% lows showed a difference of around 65%, with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D having a framerate of 223 FPS, while the Core Ultra 9 285K hung around 135 FPS.

Remnant 2

• Remnant 2 saw a 31% improvement in our testing of Remnant 2, with the Ryzen 7 getting a framerate of 158 FPS, whereas the Core Ultra 9 had a framerate of 120 FPS on average.
• The difference dropped to 14% when we examined the 1% lows, with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D hovering around 122 FPS, whereas the 285K plateaued around 107 FPS.

Homeworld 3

• Homeworld 3 has the most noticeable jump in all our testing, going from the 285K to the 9800X3D. The AMD chip had an average of 135 FPS, while the 9800X3D had a 60% lower framerate at 86 FPS.
• The 1% lows only 29 FPS on the Intel chip, whereas the 9800X3D was twice as fast, delivering a minimum of 63 FPS in this regard.

Starfield

• The difference became more modest when we tested Starfield, with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D getting an average of 140 FPS, which was around 10% higher than the 127 FPS of the Core Ultra 9.
• The 1% lows differed by around 12.7%, with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D going down to around 115 FPS, while the Core Ultra hung around 102 FPS.

Watch Dogs: Legion

• Finally, the last game of our testing gave another huge difference between the two chips, with the 9800X3D hovering around 217 FPS on average, while the Core Ultra 9 was 35% lower with a framerate of 160 FPS.
• The lows saw a 38% difference in performance, with the 9800X3D hovering around 160 FPS while the Core Ultra stuck closer to 116 FPS.

Productivity Benchmarks

Many people use their computers primarily for work, so at Tech4Gamers, we’ve also included productivity benchmarks for all our products, using the same test bench as for gaming benchmarks.

7-Zip

• The 7-Zip compression test showed that the limitation of the X3D chips is their productivity performance. The Ryzen was 47% slower, scoring 138 points, while the Core Ultra had 203 points.
• The same trend was followed with the decompression scores, with the Core Ultra 9 hovering around 212 points, 46% higher than the Ryzen processor’s 145 points.

Cinebench R24

• Cinebench showed more of the same, with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D hovering around a 1348-point multi-core score, demolished by Intel’s 82% higher 2523-point scoring.
• The difference between the single-core scores was much more modest, with an 11% difference. The Core Ultra got 150 points, while the Ryzen was closer to 135 points.

Adobe Photoshop

• Surprisingly, the Pudget systems Photoshop test ran better on the Ryzen, indicating that some productivity tasks perform better because of the X3D’s chips boosting graphics performance.
• The Ryzen had a score of 12549 points, which was around 21% greater than the 10329 points of the Intel processor.

Overall Performance

Average Framerate

The X3D chip crushed it when it came to the average framerates. We recorded an advantage of around 40% when switching to the Ryzen from the Intel processor, which is a huge difference considering that mostly everything else stayed the same in the setup.

1% Lows

The excellent performance of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D continued to the 1% lows, with an average difference of around 37%. This made the dips in performance much less noticeable, which is yet another blow to the Core Ultra’s performance.

Productivity

In our productivity tests, the Intel processor’s benchmark performance was much higher than that of the Ryzen. However, in something like Photoshop, which relies heavily on graphics, the X3D chip performed better than Intel.

Power 

Even with Intel trying to bring down the power consumption of their chips, AMD still stands supreme. It had a power consumption around 53% lower than the Core Ultra 9 285K, and AMD’s X3D chips still are untouched when it comes to performance-per-watt.

Temp 

We saw barely any difference between the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and the Core Ultra 285K. This year, AMD made some changes to the chip assembly by keeping the CCD at the bottom of the die, which allowed for great cooling performance.

Price And Availability

After all the advantages we have discussed with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D thus far, the final cherry on top is its price. It is in no way cheap, but it beats Intel by a significant margin, making the buying decision much easier for the consumer.

What We Recommend

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: If you want to buy a high-end processor for gaming, you will not find a better option than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. It is excellent in all regards, though, according to the synthetic benchmarks, it is somewhat lacking in raw compute performance.

Core Ultra 9 285K: Though we commend Intel for the steps it’s taken to improve its product, it still lacks performance, power consumption, and affordability. If your concern is only gaming, then getting the Core Ultra 9 285K does not make much sense.

After thoroughly exploring each processor, we think it is obvious that we recommend the Ryzen 7 9800X3D for everyone except those who require a lot of multi-core performance.

Uzair Qureshi

[Comparisons Specialist]

I’m a passionate computer hardware expert specializing in CPUs and GPUs. With a lifelong curiosity for hardware and extensive hands-on experience, I provide valuable insights, practical advice, and in-depth analysis on these components. Engaging with the hardware community, I exchange knowledge and stay at the forefront of technological advancements.

Get In Touch: uzair@tech4gamers.com

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ultra 9 285K: We Tested 8 Games is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News

Shehryar Khan

Senior Editor and Content Writer:

• Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
• Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
• Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
• Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

CPU	Pros	Cons
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D	✅ Offers 96MB of L3 Cache ✅ Improved thermal performance	❌ High power consumption
Core i9-14900K	✅ Enhanced single and multi-core performance ✅ Up to 6 GHz clock speed	❌ Struggles with thermal efficiency

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: The 9800X3D from Ryzen comes with 8 cores and 16 threads which provide decent performance in productivity, but the 14900K takes off the charts with its 24 cores and 32 threads.
2. Clock Speed: When it comes to clock speeds, the 9800X3D takes the lead with a base clock of 4.7GHz compared to 3.2GHz. On the other hand, the 14900K provides a better boost clock of up to 6GHz in comparison to 5.2GHz.
3. Cache: Once again, the Ryzen 9800X3D takes the lead by offering 96MB of shared L3 Cache as compared to its counterpart which is equipped with 36MB of shared L3 cache.
4. Process Node: Going over the process nodes, the 9800X3D is equipped with a 4nm node while the 14900K hosts a 10nm process node.
5. TDP: Although both chips offer a similar TDP rating, the 14900K takes a slight lead with 125W while the 9800X3D comes with a rating of 120W.

After the recent launch of the X3D chips from AMD, many users have started to speculate how well it performs against the big names of Intel’s last generation. This article will focus on that aspect and I will be testing the Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs i9-14900K in both gaming and productivity benchmarking.

Gaming Benchmarks – 1080p

Now to get things started, let’s start with the gaming benchmarking, to draw a fair conclusion I have pitted the processors against each other in several games to ensure precision and accuracy. Here is the testing rig that will be used for these benchmarks.

Test Bench

• OS – Windows 11 
• CPU Cooler – Enermax LiqMaxFlo 360mm
• Graphics Card – GIGABYTE RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
• SSD – XPG Gammix S50 Lite
• Power Supply – be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W
• Mobo (AMD) – ASRock X870E Taichi Lite
• Mobo (Intel) – MSI MPG Z890 Edge Ti WiFi Review

Player Unknown Battleground

• Starting with PUBG, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D impressed me with an average of 500 FPS, outshining the Core i9-14900K, which averaged 339 FPS. That’s about a 38% difference in favor of Ryzen, making the gameplay feel a lot smoother.
• The Ryzen handled the 1% lows better too, staying at 366 FPS compared to Core i9’s 241 FPS. This 41% gap meant fewer frame drops, which made a noticeable difference in those intense firefights.

League of Legends

• While testing League of Legends, I saw Ryzen pulling off a strong 396 FPS, whereas the Core i9 lagged behind slightly at 321 FPS. The 20.9% difference was noticeable, especially in high-action moments.
• In terms of 1% lows, Ryzen held steady at 285 FPS, compared to Core i9’s 229 FPS. This 21.7% difference meant Ryzen felt more consistent during team fights, where every frame counts.

Overwatch 2

• Overwatch 2 was interesting because both CPUs performed closely. Ryzen averaged 539 FPS, with Core i9 close behind at 519 FPS, just about a 3.7% lead for Ryzen.
• When it came to 1% lows, though, Ryzen still felt smoother, managing 488 FPS while Core i9 hit 436 FPS. The extra 11.2% lead in lows made the gameplay feel just a bit more stable during hectic battles.

Lost Ark

• In Lost Ark, Ryzen took a strong lead, averaging 405 FPS, while the Core i9 only managed 274 FPS. The 38.5% difference really showed up in crowded areas, making Ryzen feel significantly smoother.
• For 1% lows, Ryzen held its ground at 220 FPS compared to Core i9’s 165 FPS, giving me around 28.5% more stability during busy scenes with lots of enemies on screen.

Dota 2

• Dota 2 ran beautifully on Ryzen, hitting an average of 404 FPS, much higher than Core i9’s 234 FPS. The 53.2% difference was evident, especially during big team fights where I noticed Ryzen handling the action more fluidly.
• Moreover, for the 1% lows, Ryzen stayed at 162 FPS, while Core i9 dropped to 120 FPS. This 29.7% gap in lows made Ryzen feel more reliable in high-pressure situations, keeping the frame drops to a minimum.

Cyberpunk 2077

• While testing Cyberpunk 2077, Ryzen reached 227 FPS on average, which was a decent step up from the Core i9’s 167 FPS. This 30.4% difference added a noticeable improvement to the overall experience.
• In terms of 1% lows, Ryzen performed well at 185 FPS, while Core i9 fell to 147 FPS. That extra 22.8% on Ryzen helped it feel more stable in busy city scenes and high-action moments.

Black Myth: Wukong

• Black Myth: Wukong was really close between the two processors. Ryzen averaged 84 FPS, just a slight edge over Core i9’s 83 FPS, which made them feel almost identical in terms of performance.
• However, for 1% lows, Ryzen had a small advantage with 78 FPS compared to Core i9’s 71 FPS. This 9.3% difference wasn’t huge, but it did add a little extra smoothness when things got intense.

Productivity Benchmarks

Since the gaming benchmarks have been covered and we can pretty much see a clear winner, let’s switch the stage and check how well they perform when it comes to productivity benchmarking.

Cinebench R24

• When I was testing single-core performance in Cinebench R24, the Core i9-14900K had a slight edge, scoring 140 compared to Ryzen’s 133. The 5.1% difference gives a minor lead in single-core tasks, but it’s not a massive gap.
• During multi-core tests, the Core i9-14900K took a substantial lead with a score of 2179, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D scored 1318. This 49.2% difference highlights the Core i9’s advantage in heavy workloads.

Geekbench 6

• In Geekbench 6’s single-core test, both CPUs performed almost identically, with Ryzen scoring at 3307 and Core i9 at 3291 only a tiny 0.4% difference. In practical terms, this means they’re almost indistinguishable in single-core tasks.
• For multi-core performance, the Core i9-14900K took a noticeable lead, scoring 23053 compared to Ryzen’s 18223. That 23.4% difference makes Core i9 the stronger choice for multi-threaded tasks.

iGPU – FP32 Performance

• While testing FP32 performance, the Core i9’s integrated GPU performed much better, scoring 846 versus Ryzen’s 565. This 39.8% difference means that the Core i9’s iGPU could be handy for applications using iGPU performance.

Overall Performance

Average Framerate

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D performs exceptionally well when it comes to gaming performance and takes a major lead of 27.5% over the Core i9-14900K which makes it really tempting for any users looking to upgrade and improve their gaming experience.

1% Lows

After getting a detailed analysis of the 1% lows of both processors, it can be safely said that the Ryzen 7 9800X3D provides a more stable gaming experience as there is a major 23.4% difference when compared to the Core i9-14900K.

Productivity

On the contrary to the gaming performance, the Core i9-14900K finally takes the lead when compared against the Ryzen 7 9800X3D in the productivity benchmarks which comes as no surprise as the chip hosts more cores and threads.

Thermal Efficiency

Due to the utilization of the new chipset technology, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D can provide great results while generating as little heat as possible. During our testing, this fact checked out as the chip was 26.4% more thermally efficient compared to Core i9-14900K.

Price 

Although the Core i9-14900K was more expensive at its launch, it is currently being sold at a cheaper price when compared to the new 9800X3D chip. Furthermore, since the latter is still new, users might face shortage issues when trying to acquire it.

What I Recommend

Core i9-14900K: Although the Core i9 struggles in gaming performance, it makes up for it when it comes to productivity tasks. Moreover, since the chip is equipped with 24 cores and 32 threads, it is bound to save you a lot of time if you are using it in content creation.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: Being the cream of the 9000 lineup, the X3D chips never fail to deliver, similar to how they have performed before the 9800X3D also offers remarkable gaming performance while also offering decent efficiency in productivity tasks.

To sum it all up, both the processors have their ups and downs, while the Core i9 is unparalleled when it comes to content creation, the 9800X3D doesn’t fall far behind while offering a major boost in gaming performance so the decision to get either of these chips rests on your priorities.

Shehryar Khan

[Comparisons Expert]

Shehryar Khan, a seasoned PC hardware expert, brings over three years of extensive experience and a deep passion for the world of technology. With a love for building PCs and a genuine enthusiasm for exploring the latest advancements in components, his expertise shines through his work and dedication towards this field. Currently, Shehryar is rocking a custom loop setup for his built.

Get In Touch: shehryar@tech4gamers.com

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs i9-14900K: Our Recommendation is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News

Shehryar Khan

Senior Editor and Content Writer:

• Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
• Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
• Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
• Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

CPU	Pros	Cons
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D	✅ Comes with 96MB of L3 Cache ✅ Equipped with 8 Cores	❌ Increased Power Consumption
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D	✅ Improved Power Efficiency ✅ Compatible with DDR5 Memory	❌ Low Thermal Efficiency

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: Although from different generations, both processors come equipped with 8 cores, and the threads follow the same pattern having 16 each.
2. Clock Speed: Regarding clock speeds, the 7800X3D comes with a 4.20 GHz base clock and a 4.7 GHz up to boost clock speed. On the other hand, the 9800X3D improves this by offering a 4.2GHz base clock and a 5.2GHz up-to-boost clock.
3. Cache: Similar to clock speeds, both the processors utilize a shared 96 MB of L3 Cache and 1 MB of L2 Cache per core respectively. But the 9800X3D takes a slight edge in L1 cache, using 80 KB per core instead of 64 KB.
4. Process Node: The 7800X3D utilized a 5nm process node, which has been further optimized in the 9800X3D with a 4nm process node enhancing efficiency. 
5. TDP: Both the chips come with the same TDP rating of 120 W, which on chart shows their identical power consumption levels but this will be further tested in gaming scenarios.

The recent launch of the Ryzen 9000 series from AMD has received its fair share of criticism as the overall series has been considered a flop. But the company has finally decided to release its infamous X3D lineup to improve its image. In this article, we will be testing the Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gaming Benchmarks – 1080p

To get the most accurate and precise results, we will be testing both of these processors in a series of gaming benchmarks. So if your main purpose of getting these processors is to game, these tests will help you solidify your decision on which one to get for your system. Furthermore, the following testing rig has been used for these benchmarks.

Test Bench

• OS – Windows 11 
• CPU Cooler – Enermax LiqMaxFlo 360mm
• Graphics Card – GIGABYTE RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
• SSD – XPG Gammix S50 Lite
• Power Supply – be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W
• Mobo (AMD) – ASRock X870E Taichi Lite

Cyperpunk 2077

• Starting the first game, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D gave me about 158 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D averaged around 143 FPS. That’s a noticeable 9.9% advantage, making gameplay feel just a bit smoother on the 9800X3D.
• For those tough moments, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D held up with 120 FPS in the 1% lows, while the 7800X3D dipped down to 108 FPS around a 10.5% difference. It’s a small boost but does make things feel more stable.

Microsoft Flight Simulator

• In Flight Simulator, the 9800X3D came out ahead with 145 FPS compared to 127 FPS on the 7800X3D. That’s a 13.2% difference, which is quite nice for smoother visuals in such a demanding game.
• Moreover, in 1% lows, the 9800X3D stayed strong with 111 FPS, whereas the 7800X3D was around 71 FPS, a more significant 43.9% difference that helps keep the game stable in intensive scenes.

Hogwarts Legacy

• Playing Hogwarts Legacy, I got about 103 FPS on the 9800X3D and 86 FPS on the 7800X3D. That’s around a 17.9% difference, which helps the game look smoother on the higher-end processor.
• The 9800X3D managed 56 FPS in the 1% lows compared to 47 FPS on the 7800X3D, giving it a slight but noticeable edge of 17.4% in handling dips.

Forza Horizon 5

• In Forza Horizon 5, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D averaged around 271 FPS, just slightly higher than the 7800X3D’s 263 FPS. The difference is only 2.9%, so both give a pretty smooth experience.
• When it came to 1% lows, the 9800X3D scored 202 FPS, while the 7800X3D had 173 FPS a difference of 15.4% that you might feel in high-speed scenes.

Ghost of Tsushima

• Running Ghost of Tsushima, the 9800X3D pulled off 219 FPS compared to the 7800X3D’s 197 FPS, a 10.5% difference. That makes for a subtly smoother experience on the 9800X3D.
• With 1% lows following a similar picture, the 9800X3D was at 192 FPS, while the 7800X3D was closer to 164 FPS, giving the newer processor a 15.7% boost for consistency.

Starfield

• In Starfield, I saw 133 FPS on the 7800X3D, but the 9800X3D pushed ahead with 153 FPS creating a 13.9% difference, enough to make the gameplay slightly more fluid.
• For the 1% lows, the 9800X3D achieved 126 FPS compared to 102 FPS on the 7800X3D. This 21% gap is quite noticeable, especially in Starfield’s denser areas.

God of War Ragnarok

• Playing God of War, both processors performed closely, with the 9800X3D at 346 FPS and the 7800X3D at 338 FPS only a small 2.3% difference, so either one handles this game beautifully.
• In 1% lows, the 9800X3D showed 227 FPS, while the 7800X3D dropped a bit more to 213 FPS. The difference is small just amounting to 6.3%, but it’s there if you’re really looking.

The Witcher 3

• In The Witcher 3, I got around 116 FPS on the 9800X3D, while the 7800X3D hit 100 FPS, a 14.8% advantage on the newer chip that smooths out Geralt’s adventures.
• Checking the 1% lows, the 9800X3D maintained 102 FPS, while the 7800X3D dropped to 70 FPS. That’s a significant 32.3% difference, making the 9800X3D feel a lot more stable in heavy scenes.

Productivity Benchmarks

Since the gaming benchmarks are out of the way, let’s test these processors based on their productivity scores so that users can get additional insights into their performance.

Cinebench R24

• Running Cinebench R24, I noticed a nice bump in both single-core and multi-core scores with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. In single-core, it hit 133 compared to the 7800X3D’s 115, which made everything feel just a bit snappier.
• But the real difference showed up in multi-core tasks, where the 9800X3D scored 1354 over the 7800X3D’s 1108. That extra power in multi-core really stands out in heavy workloads, making multitasking and rendering noticeably faster.

Adobe Photoshop 2025

• In Photoshop, the 9800X3D scored 12073, outperforming the 7800X3D, which scored 10363. This 1710-point boost means smoother performance in Photoshop, especially with complex layers and filters.

Blender

• Testing Blender, the 9800X3D rendered at 333.2, significantly faster than the 7800X3D’s 265.9. That’s about a 67.3-point advantage, which really cuts down render times in 3D work.

Overall Performance

Average Framerate

During my testing, the results came up with an 8.5% average gaming performance difference between the processors which doesn’t seem something really worth upgrading over. In some games, there was barely a difference of 2.9% strengthening my claim even further.

1% Lows

While checking the 1% lows I noticed a bigger percentage, with the two processors showing a difference of 17.6%, which does showcase the capability of the 9800X3D as a more stable option.

Productivity

When it came to productivity both processors performed exceptionally, with the 9800X3D having a slight edge in Cinebench 24, and a major one of 22.4% in Blender showcasing its productivity capabilities.

Power

As I was testing these processors, one of the things that came to light was the higher power consumption on the 9800X3D, which is quite surprising seeing how it is thermally more efficient than the 7800X3D which utilizes 22.7% less power.

Price 

Although both processors came with a close retail price, due to the shortage of the new generation chips the prices have skyrocketed and some scalpers are selling it with as much as 30-40% price hike, which makes the situation worse if the available units get sold out.

What We Recommend

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D: According to my testing results and research, the 7800X3D is still an exceptional option for anyone looking for a significant performance bump while not breaking the bank.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D: On the flip side, the 9800X3D does pack a punch when it comes to gaming, productivity, thermal efficiency, and overclocking due to the recent change in its chipset, but because of its shortage, the prices have hiked significantly which is a major concern. 

In my opinion, anyone currently using the 7800X3D processor for anything higher than 1080p doesn’t need to switch as the difference in performance is not worth it considering the price difference. But if you are coming from an old-gen processor, then I would recommend the 9800X3D.

Shehryar Khan

[Comparisons Expert]

Shehryar Khan, a seasoned PC hardware expert, brings over three years of extensive experience and a deep passion for the world of technology. With a love for building PCs and a genuine enthusiasm for exploring the latest advancements in components, his expertise shines through his work and dedication towards this field. Currently, Shehryar is rocking a custom loop setup for his built.

Get In Touch: shehryar@tech4gamers.com

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: We Tested Both is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News

Shehryar Khan

Senior Editor and Content Writer:

• Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
• Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
• Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
• Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.

See full bio

Comparison Table

With the release of the PlayStation 5 Pro, priced at $700, many fans are left questioning whether the upgraded console justifies the steep cost. Don’t worry, as this comparison of the PlayStation 5 vs PlayStation 5 Pro will tell you what type of customer base either one of these consoles has!

Games

A console is only as good as the games you can play on it, and this is just as true for the PS5 Pro as it is for the PS5. The PlayStation 5’s lineup is weak compared to the last generation, and the subset of games that can take advantage of the PS5 Pro (at launch) is even smaller.

According to the PlayStation Blog, out of the 791 games that the PlayStation 5 supports, only 54 take advantage of the Pro console’s features. This number is likely to increase as the PS5 Pro ages, but we know that not every game will be “better” on the pro console.

Upscaling

The PS5 has always been able to support 4k 120 FPS gaming, as it has all the necessary hardware to display an image with that resolution and framerate, but we’ve had a GPU bottleneck with this console.

Most current generations do not support this mode outside of some competitive games, but this is said to change with the Playstation 5 Pro. 

Even though Sony’s latest console has improved hardware quite a bit (we will get into that in a second), the biggest addition is the PlayStation Spectral Super Resolution or PSSR. This feature allows AI upscaling in games, which can enhance your experience in two key ways.

Firstly, you can play games at a higher resolution without framerate setbacks. Internally, the game will be rendered at a lower resolution to support high framerates, but the upscaling magic will display a higher resolution. This means an improvement in visual quality with no framerate setback.

Secondly, you can run games with even more fidelity (meaning the in-game sliders will be higher) if you choose to game in that mode with a lower framerate. However you want to play your games, PSSR will squeeze much more of your console than possible in the past, given the game you’re playing supports it.

Specifications

After discussing some more nuanced problems with the PlayStation 5 Pro, we will now move on to the cold, hard specs compared to the vanilla PlayStation 5.

Size

According to the specs of the PS5 Pro, it should have about the same dimensionality as a PS5 Slim, which was much smaller than the fat PS5. This means you should be able to keep in the same spot in your console if you decide to get the newer model.

This is a good time to mention that the PlayStation 5 Pro does not come with a vertical stand, so if you decide to upgrade, keep your old one.

Storage

The PlayStation 5 Pro’s base storage is 2 Terabytes, a much-needed improvement over the vanilla PS5’s 825 Gigabytes. Both consoles support inter-swappable M.2 SSDs. Should you require more storage, you can buy it later.

Storage speeds will be the same between the two consoles, so don’t hold out hope for faster loading times for the PS5 Pro compared to the vanilla version. The higher resolution textures needed for gaming at higher resolutions on the Pro might mean that the loading times are slightly longer, though that is also just a matter of speculation.

Connectivity

The PlayStation 5 was released with Wi-Fi 6 in 2020, and the PlayStation Slim kept this technology. However, the PS5 Pro has opted to use Wi-Fi 7. This translates to around 5x times more maximum speed if your connection supports it, lower latency, and better stability.

Apart from that, the PS5 Pro comes with other bog-standard connectivity options, including Bluetooth 5.1 and ethernet.

CPU

Surprisingly, there is almost no difference between the PS5 Slim/Vanilla CPU and the PS5 Pro. Both consoles have Zen 2-based processors, packed with 8 cores with hyperthreading, totaling 16 threads. According to most sources, this CPU’s clock speed is 3.5GHz.

Excluding from the specs, the processor mentioned in these consoles seems to be an offshoot of the Ryzen 7 5800X processor.

GPU

The biggest difference between our two contenders today is the graphics processor. The PS5 and the PS5 Pro have GPUs that use the RDNA 2.0 architecture, though there are some key differences.

The GPU in the PS5 Pro has a slightly more advanced 6nm processing node, while the vanilla PS5 has a 7nm manufacturing processor. The PS5 Pro also has a 25% higher clock speed than the PS5 Slim/Vanilla GPU.

If the graphics processor in the PS5 was around the performance of an RX 6600, the PS5 Pro processor would be closer to a 7700 XT or an RTX 4070 Ti. Ray Tracing and upscaling are the two major capabilities this GPU improves upon.

RAM

If you compare the PS and PS5 Pro spec sheets side by side, the memory configuration is one of the most noticeable features.

The vanilla PS5 has 16 gigabytes of GDDR6 memory, whereas the PS5 Pro couples 2GB of DDR5 memory. This memory is too slow to be used for gaming purposes, which indicates that its purpose is to host the console’s operating system.

We think this is a welcome change. In our use case, the PS5’s home screen is sluggish, and having dedicated memory helps mitigate that problem.

Ports

The I/O of the PS5 and PS5 Pro is the same across the board: one HDMI 2.1 port, one Ethernet port, two Type-Cs, and two USB-As. The display out is the most important port on a console, and it is safe to say that HDMI 2.1 is well and beyond what you need.

The port selection of the PS5s is plenty for a console, so we have no complaints about the lack of upgrades in this aspect of the console.

Price And Availability

The headline feature of the PlayStation 5 Pro was never its graphical capability or its AI upscaling; it was its price. While $700 seems like a lot of money for a console, it is equivalent to the cost of a launch PS4 adjusted for inflation. Furthermore, this is just the base price, which, when coupled with a few components like a disc drive and stand, can go up to $850. 

Sony’s complete lack of accessories adds to the price of the PS5 Pro. Even things that were thought to be essential a few short years ago are gone. The Blu-ray player, the console stand, and the second controller are all sold separately.

What We Recommend

PlayStation 5: It’s a console that people have enjoyed for almost 5 years, and it makes sense for many people to stick with it. This is especially true if you have a low-resolution monitor or do not care about the slight improvement in visual fidelity the graphics modes give you.

PlayStation 5 Pro: Don’t get us wrong; it’s a good console, but 350 dollars is a decent amount. It is hard to justify the price of this console for people who have the PS5, but if you don’t feel like the PS5’s performance is good enough for your 4 K TV, go for the PS5 Pro.

Whatever the price, many people will use the PS5 Pro, especially around the holidays. We hope that Sony does not take this as a sign to increase the prices of its consoles further.

Shehryar Khan

[Comparisons Expert]

Shehryar Khan, a seasoned PC hardware expert, brings over three years of extensive experience and a deep passion for the world of technology. With a love for building PCs and a genuine enthusiasm for exploring the latest advancements in components, his expertise shines through his work and dedication towards this field. Currently, Shehryar is rocking a custom loop setup for his built.

Get In Touch: shehryar@tech4gamers.com

PlayStation 5 vs PlayStation 5 Pro: We Think It’s Too Excessive is a post from Tech4Gamers - All About Technology And Gaming News